image lab software version 6 0 0 build 25 Search Results


90
Bio-Rad image lab imager (version 6.0.0 build 25
Image Lab Imager (Version 6.0.0 Build 25, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/image lab imager (version 6.0.0 build 25/product/Bio-Rad
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
image lab imager (version 6.0.0 build 25 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Bio-Rad bio rad image lab software package
Bio Rad Image Lab Software Package, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bio rad image lab software package/product/Bio-Rad
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bio rad image lab software package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bio-Rad image lab tm -version 6.0.0 build 25
Representative images from (A) Substrate-induced activation (B) Temperature-induced activation. (C) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (A) were quantified using the Image Lab TM software (version 6.0.0 build 25). The values obtained for each subunit from multiple independent experiments were plotted using Graphpad Prism software with their respective SEM. (D) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (B) were quantified and represented in a similar way as in (C).
Image Lab Tm Version 6.0.0 Build 25, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/image lab tm -version 6.0.0 build 25/product/Bio-Rad
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
image lab tm -version 6.0.0 build 25 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad computer code data collection bio rad image lab
Representative images from (A) Substrate-induced activation (B) Temperature-induced activation. (C) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (A) were quantified using the Image Lab TM software (version 6.0.0 build 25). The values obtained for each subunit from multiple independent experiments were plotted using Graphpad Prism software with their respective SEM. (D) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (B) were quantified and represented in a similar way as in (C).
Computer Code Data Collection Bio Rad Image Lab, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/computer code data collection bio rad image lab/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
computer code data collection bio rad image lab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bio-Rad image labtm - version 6.0.0 build 25
Representative images from (A) Substrate-induced activation (B) Temperature-induced activation. (C) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (A) were quantified using the Image Lab TM software (version 6.0.0 build 25). The values obtained for each subunit from multiple independent experiments were plotted using Graphpad Prism software with their respective SEM. (D) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (B) were quantified and represented in a similar way as in (C).
Image Labtm Version 6.0.0 Build 25, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/image labtm - version 6.0.0 build 25/product/Bio-Rad
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
image labtm - version 6.0.0 build 25 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Representative images from (A) Substrate-induced activation (B) Temperature-induced activation. (C) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (A) were quantified using the Image Lab TM software (version 6.0.0 build 25). The values obtained for each subunit from multiple independent experiments were plotted using Graphpad Prism software with their respective SEM. (D) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (B) were quantified and represented in a similar way as in (C).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Inter-subunit Crosstalk via PDZ Synergistically Governs Allosteric Activation of Proapoptotic HtrA2

doi: 10.1101/2021.10.04.462974

Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative images from (A) Substrate-induced activation (B) Temperature-induced activation. (C) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (A) were quantified using the Image Lab TM software (version 6.0.0 build 25). The values obtained for each subunit from multiple independent experiments were plotted using Graphpad Prism software with their respective SEM. (D) The fluorescence intensities of the control samples in (B) were quantified and represented in a similar way as in (C).

Article Snippet: For better quantitative analysis, the fluorescence intensities of each subunit band were measured using Image Lab TM -version 6.0.0 build 25 (2017, Bio-Rad laboratories, Inc.) and the fold change between the intensities of the subunits in the test samples with respect to their corresponding controls were then plotted for graphical representation.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Fluorescence, Software

(A) Active-site modification assay performed in presence of substrate. Each variant (2 µM) was reacted with TAMRA-FP (20 µM) in absence and presence of β-casein at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixtures were run on SDS-PAGE, and fluorescence scan of the complete gel was taken using ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System. The fluorescence intensities for the W and Δ subunits in each variant were quantified using the Image Lab TM software (version 6.0.0 build 25). The values obtained for each subunit from multiple independent experiments were averaged and the fold changes between the tests with respect to their corresponding controls were plotted using Graphpad Prism software. (B) Active-site modification assay performed at increased temperature. Each variant (2 µM) was reacted with TAMRA-FP (20 µM) and incubated either at 37 °C (Control) or at 50 °C (Test) for 30 min. The fluorescence imaging analysis and quantification were done similarly as in (A). (C) Quantitative assessment of proteolytic activity of HtrA2 variants with active-site mutation. Initial velocities V 0 of HtrA2 and its variants were calculated using FITC labeled–β casein as the substrate. The solid lines are the nonlinear least squares fit of the data to the Hill form of the Michaelis–Menten equation: Velocity = V max /[1 + (K 0.5 /[substrate]) n ] using Graphpad Prism software. (D) Model representing the trans -mediated allosteric communication between the adjacent subunits of HtrA2 trimeric ensemble.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Inter-subunit Crosstalk via PDZ Synergistically Governs Allosteric Activation of Proapoptotic HtrA2

doi: 10.1101/2021.10.04.462974

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Active-site modification assay performed in presence of substrate. Each variant (2 µM) was reacted with TAMRA-FP (20 µM) in absence and presence of β-casein at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixtures were run on SDS-PAGE, and fluorescence scan of the complete gel was taken using ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System. The fluorescence intensities for the W and Δ subunits in each variant were quantified using the Image Lab TM software (version 6.0.0 build 25). The values obtained for each subunit from multiple independent experiments were averaged and the fold changes between the tests with respect to their corresponding controls were plotted using Graphpad Prism software. (B) Active-site modification assay performed at increased temperature. Each variant (2 µM) was reacted with TAMRA-FP (20 µM) and incubated either at 37 °C (Control) or at 50 °C (Test) for 30 min. The fluorescence imaging analysis and quantification were done similarly as in (A). (C) Quantitative assessment of proteolytic activity of HtrA2 variants with active-site mutation. Initial velocities V 0 of HtrA2 and its variants were calculated using FITC labeled–β casein as the substrate. The solid lines are the nonlinear least squares fit of the data to the Hill form of the Michaelis–Menten equation: Velocity = V max /[1 + (K 0.5 /[substrate]) n ] using Graphpad Prism software. (D) Model representing the trans -mediated allosteric communication between the adjacent subunits of HtrA2 trimeric ensemble.

Article Snippet: For better quantitative analysis, the fluorescence intensities of each subunit band were measured using Image Lab TM -version 6.0.0 build 25 (2017, Bio-Rad laboratories, Inc.) and the fold change between the intensities of the subunits in the test samples with respect to their corresponding controls were then plotted for graphical representation.

Techniques: Modification, Variant Assay, SDS Page, Fluorescence, Imaging, Software, Incubation, Activity Assay, Mutagenesis, Labeling